Is there any difference between imperfect and imperfective aspect?
This phrase could also have an imperfective aspect: *olen pureskellut (perfect, imperfective/ pureskelin (imperfect, imperfective) * X tämän palan loppuun (this piece till the end; perfect+finite) / tätä palaa vähän aikaa (this piece for a while, imperfect+finite).
tense - What is imperfective and perfective in English? - English ...
Jan 22, 2021 · English doesn't have an "imperfective". There is a past tense for describing actions in the past. There are also a set of continuous verb forms (also called "progressive"), These are made by combining a "be" verb with a present participle. They indicate actions that are extended in time, or repeated, or temporary.
Are different "aspects" of a Polish verb the same lexeme or …
Nov 28, 2014 · Perfective or imperfective aspect is a grammatical category on the same level as number, gender, tense, case etc. On that basis, I would say that the group of "mówić" and "powiedzieć" and any inflectional form derived from these infinitives ( as: "powiedziałem,mówił,mówiąc,powiedziawszy,powiedzieli" etc.) is in fact the same lexeme .
Imperfective aspect or Future tense? - Linguistics Stack Exchange
Jun 24, 2014 · You need to distinguish between tense, aspect and time reference. For instance, the English present continuous combines a present time reference with an imperfective aspect. However, it is often used to denote future time reference as well in some contexts. E.g. "We're leaving at 8 sharp tomorrow morning."
How can the perfective aspect apply to the present tense?
Jul 18, 2017 · In English, at least, the ordinary simple present is imperfective; but there are genres in which a perfective use is common. In sports broadcasts, for instance: "He shoots, he scores!" describes an ongoing course of action but the individual events …
Is there really a perfect tense? - Linguistics Stack Exchange
Jun 6, 2017 · Especially in as far as the difference between perfective (what we considered a tense above) and imperfective (what we considered an aspect above) in English is concerned, the difference is not immediately obvious: In a situation like (3)-a John has lived in Chicago for five years vs. (3)-b John lived in Chicago for five years
semantics - Why can verbs with imperfective morphology have a ...
And there are many instances in Slavic languages where verbs with imperfective morphology have broadly perfective meanings (and vice versa). The problem you have is that you chose a verb of motion which has the following properties in most Slavic languages: has separate forms for imperfective and repetitive; does not have a clear perfective ...
Present tense and Perfective Interpretation
Nov 30, 2021 · The act of mowing is a routine action then the same should hold true for 'the act of promising'. Then why not the act of promising In the first example is Imperfective too? As simple present tense is used for general truth, habitual or routine action, permanent things, scheduled activities or narrating a story.
past tense - Imperfective and perfective aspects of verb "glow ...
But in these examples, I'm not sure how the imperfective and perfective aspects bear on the semantics. To me, both would basically mean the same in the given context. I couldn't find any reason one aspect would be preferred over the other. Does the perfectivity matter that much in the semantics of these six examples?
Which languages conflate (imperfective) past and irrealis, and why?
In languages that have an aspect distinction, it seems to be specifically the imperfective past tense that does this. Three questions: What is the specific set of irrealis contexts (e.g. counterfactual conditionals, etc.) in which past-tense forms can be used in English, and how does it differ from that of other languages that have this conflation?