What was the commercial speed of Concorde?
2016年1月12日 · Concorde’s fastest transatlantic crossing was on 7 February 1996 when it completed the New York to London flight in 2 hours 52 minutes and 59 seconds. When it flew the average flight time (was) around 3 hours 30 minutes , but can be slightly longer if the aircraft (needed) to hold before landing at the local airports.
aircraft design - Why was Concorde's cockpit so complex?
2015年7月13日 · The cockpit is much more complex than any other modern day aircraft or a fighter jet because it is an Analoguecockpit. Concorde was designed in the 60's and at that point of time the technology was not simply advanced enough to have LCD screens in the cockpit, and neither capacitive/resistive touchscreens were around the block.
aircraft design - Why did Concorde not have horizontal stabilizers ...
2018年5月15日 · Concorde was meant to be economical (on paper at least). If the sizing remained the same -- the same number of passengers in the slender 2+2 seating -- then the addition of a tailplane would have reduced the main wing area (let's assume that offsets the weight of the added mechanical complexity).
In what way are the Concorde's engines considered efficient?
2015年5月3日 · For example, Concorde cruised at Mach 2.05 with its engines giving an SFC of 1.195 lb/(lbf·h) (see below); this is equivalent to an SFC of 0.51 lb/(lbf·h) for an aircraft flying at Mach 0.85, which would be better than even modern engines; it was the world's most efficient jet engine.[2][3] However, Concorde ultimately has a heavier airframe ...
aircraft design - Why did the Concorde require a droop nose and …
2015年7月13日 · Concorde with a droop Nose deployed Concorde in normal configuration According to the wiki page on Concorde, this Droop Nose was added in the later versions of Concorde when the authorities raised questions about the restricted view which was available to pilots during landing/take off at very high angles of attack (which was required for the ...
Why didn't the Concorde have flaps or slats?
2018年5月7日 · 33. It's well known that the Concorde had no flaps or slats. The lack of high-lift devices considerably reduced lift at low speeds, requiring the Concorde to take off and land at higher speeds and angles of attack than if it had been equipped with flaps and slats. As well as greatly increasing drag (and thus fuel consumption) during takeoff and ...
Why is it common to speak of "Concorde" rather than "the …
Concorde also acquired an unusual nomenclature for an aircraft. In common usage in the United Kingdom, the type is known as "Concorde" without an article, rather than "the Concorde" or "a Concorde". The two sources given for this sentence ( BBC and British Airways ) also consistently use Concorde without an article, but unfortunately they don't ...
Why was Concorde never sold as a private business jet?
2018年11月14日 · New supersonic aircraft like Aerion AS2 are often seen in this role. However, it looks like rich individuals only bought various bones of Concorde after retirement. The fate of F-BVFD looks especially strange. As I understand, it has been retired very early, in airworthy condition, just for being a surplus aircraft.
Was the transatlantic crossing for Concorde too short to reach …
2018年11月14日 · The simple answer is that the Concorde had no single assigned altitude, it was allowed to climb freely above ~FL450; this is discussed in depth in episode 166 – Flying the Concorde (worth the listen as it answers just about every Concorde question!). As @pilothead alludes to in their answer it climbed as it burned fuel but the aircraft never ...
aircraft design - What made Concorde so heavy? - Aviation Stack …
2021年3月6日 · Mass fraction of empty to MTOW. 48.74%. 42.22%. If you compare passengers plus fuel to the empty mass of each airplane, the Concorde actually comes out well ahead of the 747 and looks like a prize of lightweight design. Having structurally efficient delta wings helped and should explain most of the difference.