Proving that a function is negligible - Mathematics Stack Exchange
The definition is quite confusing for me, but I think the intuition is that a negligible function is something that shrinks faster than 1 divided by any polynomial function? Is $2^{-x}$ negligible? I think so, but don't know how to show this.
analysis - How to check if a function is negligible? - Mathematics ...
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site
measure theory - Non-measurable sets vs. negligible sets
Negligible usually refers to the effect on your calculations, whether it's integration or just measuring sets, which is that there is no effect. This gives rise to the term "almost everywhere", or "almost surely" if you're talking to a probabilist, meaning a certain property is true EXCEPT on a set of measure zero.
Given two negligible functions f (x) and g (x), is f (x)/g (x ...
2016年11月2日 · My thought is that since a negligible function by definition is smaller than the inverse of any polynomial p(x), the quotient of f(x) and g(x) must be smaller than 1, and hence negligible. Is this
cryptography - Constructing a proof for neglible function
2021年2月9日 · For any positive polynomial p, the function negl4 defined by negl4 (n) =p(n)·negl1(n) is negligible. Now, I need to prove the second part of this definition, relying on this definition: A function f from the natural numbers to the non-negative real numbers is negligible if for every positive polynomial p there is an N such that for all ...
Is $x^n$ for some $0<x<1$ negligible? - Mathematics Stack …
A negligible function is a function that goes faster towards zero than the inverse of any polynomial (when the variable goes to infinity).
Why some negative functions are negligible but others not
2019年8月30日 · Similarly, I also do not understand why a negligible function $~f~$, is still negligible when it is $~f(n)^{-1}~$ but then a polynomial function $~t~$ that is $~t(n)^{-1}~$ is not negligible. Been trying to understand this elementary math but …
computational complexity - How to show a function is negligible ...
Plug this into (1) to find $\mu\circ p$ is negligible. For the second question: a function that decays faster than any polynomial will often have a decaying exponential term in it. Look for those. Formally, being negligible is equivalent to $$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\log |f(x)|}{\log x} = -\infty$$
Trouble understanding the theory behind negligible functions and …
A function is negligible if it is "small enough" to all practical purposes. For example, if you have a procedure that can $\epsilon$-distinguish between the output of a PRNG and random bits, then one can boost this procedure (by repeating it) and get a $1/2$-distinguisher, as you mention.
measure theory - Negligible sets - Mathematics Stack Exchange
2015年10月27日 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.