2022年11月16日 · Full details except for minor softness on the high points. 7.5 = a coin with complete details, but minor wear on some of the high points. 7.0 = a coin with complete details, but minor wear on most of the high points. 6.5 = a coin with complete details, but wear on all of the high points. 6.0 = a coin with nearly complete details, but moderate ...

2024年11月10日 · CAC Grading, as opposed to CAC -which is the choice for previously NGC/PCGS encapsulated graded pieces. CAC Grading is VERY conservative and the Grading Standards are as stringent as CAC. Their Registry will work fine, and more self-build classifications, if the goal was a TPG with Registry offering.

2007年3月1日 · The ebay seller owns the grading service and is putting his own grade on the coins, hoping that enough people will believe that because the coin is in a slab that the coin's grade is legitimate. It's even worse than someone marking an AU coin "MS-66" on a 2x2 holder, because the slab gives an impression that someone independent has certified ...

2024年10月10日 · Because NGC policy states that "Light, non-destructive cleaning, particularly when found on older coins, may still permit numeric grading" I am sure there is no chance of a successful claim since that describes the situation and the coin is likely within policy.

2022年12月27日 · NGC does a very nice job with grading Roman imperial coins. But since I like my coins raw, I don't have a lot of them. I do have a couple of pieces that dealers crack out of NGC holders and sold. NGC is the leading grader from world coins. I think that they do a better job than PCGS in that area. PCGS is better for U.S. coins, in my opinion.

2023年12月29日 · Ben the coin geek had a video where they were tough on his coins too, but they did actually upgrade a peace dollar from Ms63 (at both services) to CACG MS64. There was also a capped bust dollar that went from PCGS 61->NGC 58 -> PCGS details QC -> NGC Details Cleaned -> CACG 58.

2022年11月16日 · However, we are not starting from scratch. Trying to rescale coin grades at this point seems a bit silly. Especially since the non-numeric grading terminology that we use also has 7 tiers: AG, G, F, VF, XF, AU, MS. Is NGC gonna invent 3 …

2009年8月18日 · If you can find a nicer NGC example of a coin, and have no intention of selling, and you can get it cheaper, go with NGC. The biggest things to look at, are how PCGS/NGC give out designations, like DPL/DMPL, PL, FH, FBL, FB, etc.. I know PCGS is actually more generous with DMPL's and PL's than NGC is, due to their grading standards...

2019年11月25日 · I just sent a raw 1916-D mercury dime to NGC to be graded. Never did this before but the costs have made me think never to do it again. The costs are as follows. Had to join NGC (lowest tier)-----$25.00 Handling fee on submissions----- $10.00 Grading (12 to 14 days turnaround)----- $35.00 Return postage fees value of $1 to $2K--$30.00

2024年7月29日 · The biggest difference between PCGS and NGC is their grading standards for classic issues in the XF45-58 ranges Bottom line up front NGC uses an older more classic definition for XF and AU that weights detail loss as the primary attribute where PCGS weights surface preservation predominately.