The jury’s out on whether the US is still at the top of global science. Proposed cuts to major agencies could mean completely ...

The fallout over the Trump administration’s imposition of a cap on National Institutes of Health payments for indirect costs on ... “would slash funding and cut research activity at Harvard ...

On Friday, the Trump Administration announced that it would cap the indirect cost rate for federal grants from the National Institutes of Health at fifteen percent. According to the Administration ...

The National Institutes of Health, the nation’s premier funder of biomedical research, announced Friday night that it will immediately slash support for “indirect costs” paid to universities ...

However, there are those in the life sciences community, like the University of California, San Franciso's Vinay Prasad, who argue that there is "no evidence" that cutting NIH funds of indirect ...

Stanford University faces a $160 million annual funding cut as the NIH reduces indirect cost allocations from 26% to 15%, impacting research infrastructure. The policy, effective February 10 ...

Wolinetz is chair of the health bioscience innovations practice at Lewis-Burke Associates and former chief of staff to the director of NIH. I’ve spent more than two decades of work in ...

From Feb. 10, the U.S. NIH is to cut the amount of its grants that go to indirect costs, in a move it says will save $4 billion per annum, but which scientists say will hit breakthrough biomedical ...

The National Institutes of Health announced late Friday that it will be significantly reducing the amount of money universities can receive for “indirect costs” of research, a move that will ...