Even the best written of the hundreds of statutes governing judicial review of agency regulations include ambiguities.

For at least 153 years, the Supreme Court has unmistakably held that the nation’s courts lack jurisdiction over matters ...

The House Has No Authority to ‘Disagree’ with Senate’s Decision to Remain in Session This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—November 16 This Day in Liberal Judicial ... Currier) with various ...

Republican lawmakers plan to bring a bill to the 2025 legislative session that would create a new court in Montana they said ...

A bench of Justices Atul Sreedharan and Sanjay Dhar underscored that courts and tribunals lack the technical expertise ...

The Supreme Court decided Marbury v, Madison (herein Marbury) in 1803, early in Chief Justice John Marshall’s career on the ...

The Irish Constitution contains a pre-enactment abstract review procedure under Article 26 whereby, before signing a Bill into law, the President can refer the Bill to the Supreme Court for a decision ...

“A majority of the Commissioners stand ready to continue studying potential reforms to judicial selection if the Legislature ...

"This isn't over at all," a visibly upset Kathy Allen, Richard Allen's wife, said as she left the courthouse Monday, hinting ...

The White House counsel’s letter to the ABA said the administration “welcomes the ABA to evaluate judicial candidates, just as it welcomes them from any other professional organization or interest ...

Or sign-in if you have an account. EDMONTON — Premier Danielle Smith says Alberta has applied for a judicial review of Ottawa’s exemption of the carbon tax on home heating oil. We apologize ...