The case, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Michael Cargill, could also have broader implications for an administration that, facing congressional gridlock, has leaned on the ATF’s ...

Michael Cargill, a U.S. Army veteran who owns a gun store in Austin, says in the lawsuit that bump stocks do not fit the legal definition of a machine gun since they do not continuously fire with ...

Michael Cargill bought two bump stocks in 2018 that he had to surrender a year later after ATF’s new rule was finalized. Cargill filed a lawsuit in a Texas federal court but a bench trial ended in a ...

Michael Cargill told the court that bump stocks only trigger one shot per function of the trigger, disqualifying them from the language in the 1986 law. Jonathan Mitchell, an attorney with Mitchell ...