The Trump administration’s decision to cap how much NIH will pay for indirect costs on university research grants would cost ...
How Science, Students, And Colleges Will Suffer In the world of academic research, indirect costs are the unsung heroes.
The drastic reduction in indirect costs is not a path to innovation or cost savings — it’s a threat to U.S.’s position as ...
National Institutes of Health slashed overhead costs allowed under its grants to match private foundations, but the two don't ...
In statements and interviews with The Crimson, nine life sciences researchers at Harvard said limits on indirect cost ...
The NIH projected the cut will save it $4 billion during the current federal fiscal year, which ends September 30. That’s nearly half of the $9 billion that the NIH said it set aside for overhead ...
The Trump administration recently announced the National Institutes of Health will make big changes in the way it funds ...
On Friday, the Trump Administration announced that it would cap the indirect cost rate for federal grants from the National Institutes of Health at fifteen percent. According to the Administration ...
The University of Rochester Medical Center told News 8 it is “closely monitoring” NIH’s announcement it was cutting “indirect costs” for research institutions that receive its grants. According to the ...
NIH said it was cutting its rate of funding indirect costs to be more in line with private foundations that fund research, noting that many foundations do not fund indirect costs at all.
The National Institutes of Health will now cap indirect funding ... agency can unilaterally and overnight make this kind of cut for existing grants. In its X post on Friday, the NIH highlighted ...
The National Institutes of Health announced late Friday that it will be significantly reducing the amount of money universities can receive for “indirect costs” of research, a move that will ...